🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.