🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear the manager was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece against a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, undermining some of the club’s most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to dance. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim came at the executive and seems to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a coach who often railed his squad for losing individual battles crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind that United’s competitors will now be rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Regarding System and Philosophy

To illustrate, this was the director who being involved in the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, such directives carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Power In the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace data science and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach to football “will be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate football matters, leveraging his background in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Whom else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

A New Football Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and energy to join an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their offering to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face for a club they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas the people who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Few

And possibly in a small way this represents corporate governance at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the system coach only to dismiss them for using too much 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and later bin them for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.